data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc09e/fc09e3a1987f0f5cb4f6b5452d65ee82b56124bd" alt=""
So don't even mention luxuries, if that's not the point, unless you are really trying to be subliminal (you're not). Or maybe you're in the wrong calling, and you shouldn't be a priest anymore.
Applying The Wonderment of Discovery to Non Scientific Pursuits
Well, that might have jinxed it. They could have just called it the "Action Filled Hulk". Because it certainly was short on development. Sure the nods to the TV show are great, but it doesn't have to share everything with episodic formula*.
I liked the King Kong analogous cliff scene (which I don't know if it was intentional or not) and the Hulk using tools (and not just to throw around).
After doing a great job defining the physical change in Peter Parker in Spider-Man there wasn't much improvement in Tim Roth's build before and after the super soldier injections, and he was supposed to be a combat veteran in the first place.
Iron Man still is the better Marvel movie of the year.
* You don't want to know how many times that sentence was revised to prevent spoilers.
As the creators themselves admitted, it's simplistic comedy, and doesn't work if you look at it too deeply, particularly in how the final conflict concluded.
Having just come from another "prophecy" laden "fantasy" in 10,000 BC, I didn't like that part, which, when coupled with the oft-repeated line "there are no accidents" means they were all just slaves to fate.
And given the suspicion that Dreamworks always seems to be following concepts first introduced by Pixar (A Bug's Life - Antz; Finding Nemo - Shark's Tale; Monsters Inc - Shrek; Ratatouille - Flushed Away; The Wild - Madagascar) this seems to be their Incredibles equivalent.